back

What Are OKRs and How to Set Them Correctly? [+ Best Practices]

Last Updated on August 18, 2026 by Status.net Editorial Team

Objectives and Key Results are principles that define unifying goals within the company and the ways to get there. OKRs are a preferred framework for goal setting for a lot of modern companies because they unite two essential methods of gathering information to make informed decisions concerning company goals: qualitative and quantitative data gathering.

Part 1What Are Objectives and Key Results (OKRs)?

  • Objectives: A Qualitative Approach

This part of the OKR is meant to inspire and motivate employees. It adds a sense of meaning for those who are not necessarily impressed by just “hitting the numbers.”

To be effective, they should be doable within one to three months to continue to inspire employees that goal-reaching is not only possible but something they can regularly do within their departments. These should not utilize number or percentages. According to a 2013 brain study, nearly 29 percent of Americans are strictly right-brained, while 33 percent have an equal influence from both sides of the brain. This is who objectives are created for.

  • Key Results: For Those Who Thrive on Data

The other 37 percent of people represented by the study mentioned above digest information the objectives are broadly trying to convey through this method.

Key results take the words of objectives and turn them into quantitative measurements that are easily digestible. Many times, these are referred to as “Metrics.”

Key results can measure growth, sales, consumer engagement, performance, and quality. They should be challenging, but not impossible. Where a department is currently performing should inform the starting point, and the crucial final result should take into account where leaders would like to see the unit go.

Part 2How the OKR Methodology Works as a Goal-Setting System

The OKR methodology is a structured goal-setting system that connects ambitious aspirations to measurable outcomes. Popularized by venture capitalist John Doerr, who introduced the framework to Google in 1999 after learning it from Andy Grove at Intel, the OKR approach has since become a foundational management practice at organizations of every size.

At its core, the OKR model operates on a simple formula: I will [Objective] as measured by [Key Results]. The objective describes what you want to achieve. The key results describe how you will know you have achieved it. This pairing forces clarity. It prevents teams from chasing vague goals with no way to confirm success.

What makes the OKR system distinct from other goal-setting methods is its built-in rhythm. OKRs are typically set on a quarterly basis, though some organizations run annual OKRs at the company level alongside quarterly ones at the team level. Each cycle includes three phases:

  • Setting: Leaders and teams collaboratively define objectives and key results for the upcoming period.
  • Tracking: Progress is monitored through regular check-ins, often weekly or biweekly, so that teams can course-correct before the quarter ends.
  • Scoring: At the end of the cycle, each key result is graded. This reflection period is where the deepest learning happens.

The OKR framework also distinguishes between two types of objectives. Committed OKRs represent outcomes the team agrees to deliver fully, typically scoring 1.0 out of 1.0. Aspirational OKRs (sometimes called “moonshots”) are intentionally set beyond comfortable reach; a score of 0.6 to 0.7 on an aspirational OKR often signals strong performance. This distinction matters because it creates psychological safety around stretch goals. Teams can aim high without fear of punishment when they fall slightly short.

The OKR principles that tie everything together are transparency, alignment, and focus. When these principles are working, every person in the organization can trace their daily work back to a company-level priority. That line of sight is what gives the methodology its power.

OKR Levels: Company, Team, and Individual Alignment

One of the most valuable features of the OKR system is its ability to cascade through multiple levels of an organization while keeping everyone aligned on shared priorities. Most companies implement OKRs across three tiers:

  • Company-level OKRs: These represent the organization’s top priorities for the quarter or year. They are typically set by the executive team and communicate the direction the entire company is headed. A company OKR might focus on entering a new market, hitting a revenue milestone, or improving customer satisfaction scores.
  • Team or department-level OKRs: Each team defines its own objectives and key results that directly support the company-level OKRs. A product team, for example, might set an objective around launching a feature that the company-level OKR identified as critical for growth.
  • Individual-level OKRs: Some organizations extend the framework to individual contributors. Employee OKRs clarify each person’s contribution to the team’s goals and can be especially useful in performance conversations. However, many OKR practitioners advise caution here. When individual OKRs are tied too tightly to compensation or performance reviews, people tend to sandbag their targets to guarantee success. That dynamic undermines the stretch-goal culture OKRs are designed to foster.

Alignment does not mean top-down dictation. In healthy OKR implementations, roughly 40 to 60 percent of OKRs originate from the bottom up. Teams closest to the customer or the product often have the clearest view of what key results are realistic and which objectives will create the most impact. The conversation between levels is what creates real alignment.

A practical tip: before finalizing any team-level OKR, ask a simple question. “If we achieve every one of our key results, does that meaningfully move the company-level objective forward?” If the answer is unclear, the OKR needs revision.

Part 3Why Are OKRs a Preferred Method by Many Current Companies?

OKRs were initially developed by the Intel Corporation. They are now used by some of the largest tech behemoths such as LinkedIn, Zynga, and General Assembly. However, there is one corporation that has taken the idea of OKRs and run with them, and that is Google. In the early years of Google’s existence, an investor named John Doerr made a presentation urging the company to embrace this concept. Google jumped on board, and the rest is history. Here are four significant reasons Google has utilized the idea of OKRs:

  1. They have helped employees see their progress in accomplishing departmental goals.
    Rick Klau, a Google Ventures partner, described his ease at monitoring OKRs he and his team set for revamping the YouTube homepage.
    This not only helped the team keep track of how close or far they were from the goal, but he was also able to quantify his accomplishments during performance reviews easily.
  2. The OKR Framework can be used at all hierarchal levels of the company.
    Google has OKRs at an overall organization, team, managerial, and personal level.
    Since all parts of the company measure goals and their results with the same method, it is easy for all levels and departments to understand and communicate information concerning it.
  3. They help companies determine how proficient they are in goal setting.
    The OKR framework allows departments and business leaders hone the essential skill of setting OKRs in the.
    Google uses a 0 to 1 method to rate abilities to meet goals. If someone is regularly getting a 1.0, the insinuation is that the goal is not challenging enough. If they are getting below a 0.5, then it may be worth it to assess if the OKR is too far-reaching.
  4. It is a simple way to ensure things get done.
    First and foremost, companies large and small use this method to have a way to make sure things get done efficiently and effectively.
    OKRs take lofty goals and complex data and break it down into something that all employees can easily understand and strive for. It is a goal standardization tactic that not only addresses concerns about essential metrics but can help start the conversation about how to get there.
  What Is Democratic (Participative) Leadership? - 5 Main Principles

Part 4How to Measure OKRs and Track Key Result Progress

Setting OKRs is only half the equation. The real value of the framework emerges when you measure progress consistently and use those measurements to inform decisions. Without disciplined tracking, OKRs become a quarterly ritual that people forget about the moment they leave the planning meeting.

The most widely adopted scoring method uses a 0.0 to 1.0 scale for each key result:

  • 0.0 to 0.3: Little or no progress was made. This signals either a blocked initiative or an objective that did not receive sufficient attention.
  • 0.4 to 0.6: Meaningful progress, though the target was not fully met. For aspirational OKRs, this range can represent solid performance.
  • 0.7 to 1.0: The key result was largely or fully achieved. For committed OKRs, anything below 1.0 warrants a conversation about what went wrong.

The objective itself is not scored independently. Its progress is typically the average of its underlying key results, giving leaders a quick snapshot of how the broader goal is tracking.

What makes OKR metrics useful is their specificity. Every key result should include a number: a percentage increase, a count, a dollar amount, a time reduction. Vague key results like “improve customer experience” cannot be measured and therefore cannot be scored. A measurable alternative would be “increase Net Promoter Score from 38 to 50 by end of Q3.”

One common mistake is treating the OKR score as a performance grade. Scores are a learning tool. When a team consistently scores 1.0 on every OKR, the objectives likely are not ambitious enough. When a team consistently scores below 0.3, the objectives may be unrealistic or the team may be under-resourced. Both patterns deserve attention.

OKR Reporting and Review Cadence That Drives Results

Measuring OKRs at the end of the quarter is essential, but the teams that get the most value from the framework also check in regularly throughout the cycle. A well-structured reporting cadence typically looks like this:

  • Weekly check-ins (10 to 15 minutes): Each team briefly reviews where their key results stand. These are not deep-dive meetings. The goal is to surface blockers early and keep OKRs visible in everyday work. A simple traffic-light system (green, yellow, red) works well for weekly updates.
  • Monthly or mid-quarter reviews (30 to 60 minutes): This is where teams assess whether their current trajectory will deliver results by the end of the quarter. If a key result is off-track, mid-quarter is the right time to adjust tactics, reallocate resources, or, in rare cases, revise the key result itself.
  • End-of-quarter scoring and reflection (60 to 90 minutes): Teams score each key result, discuss what drove the outcome, and capture lessons learned. The reflection matters as much as the score. Ask questions like: “What would we do differently?” and “What did we learn about our capacity?”

Many organizations make OKR reporting visible across the company. When OKRs are public, teams can spot dependencies and collaboration opportunities that would otherwise remain hidden. Transparency also builds accountability; when everyone can see your progress, there is a natural motivation to follow through.

The tool you use matters less than the habit you build. Some companies use dedicated OKR software, while others track progress in simple spreadsheets. What matters is that the cadence is predictable and that check-ins lead to action.

Part 5OKRs, The Secret to Increasing Employee Engagement?

There have been two recent studies that have revealed some interesting data about employee engagement and their interaction and understanding of company goals.

A study by researchers at the University of Technology in Sydney asked employees from 20 of Australia’s top performing companies to select their employer’s strategy from six choices. Only 29 percent were able to guess the strategy correctly.

In 2016, Gallup conducted a study that found that only 32 percent of employees within the United States was engaged. The number dropped to 13 percent when worldwide data was included. Can OKRs make company strategy clearer for employees while also increasing engagement?

Another Gallup poll showed the impact of managers setting actionable goals with employees; 69 percent of employees who reported feeling engaged at their place of employment worked with their managers to set performance goals. This reveals that there is a connection between goal setting and employee engagement. Sharp attention to both can increase departmental and company productivity. Therefore, this statistic should be on the radar of all business leaders and managers.

Part 6How Can Business Leaders Set Actionable OKRs?

Setting OKRs seems like a straightforward process, but there are some nuances that can make establishing these goals complex. An employee at Google, a company with a lot of interactions with OKRs, developed a comprehensive tutorial and template for OKRs. Their method can help managers and business get started with developing actionable objectives and key results.

  • Step 1

    Introduce OKRs to your Department or Organization

     

    If this is a concept that is new to a department, then interested business leaders should adequately introduce this process to teams. They should address the importance of OKRs, how they work, and answer any questions concerning their effectiveness.

  • Step 2

    Establish Measurable Objectives

     

    Everyone in the team should participate in this part of the process. These can be overall departmental or personal goals for each person. They should represent “stretch goals,” that are challenging but not impossible to reach. This involves some thoughtful pre-planning strategies that locate crucial problem areas.
    Those with experience with OKRs suggest creating four to six objectives.
    Examples of objectives:

     

    1. Improve question matching technology
    2. Increase customer satisfaction with the new system rollout

  • Step 3

    Create Key Results for Each Objective
    For each objective, leaders and employees should produce two to four key results.
    Most of these should be quantifiable and inform leaders and employees on how they can address and meet the objective. Those looking to achieve these goals should establish confidence levels. They can be 0 to 1 like Google’s or utilize another numerical scale. This can help with deciding how confident leaders and employees are with meeting the goal. If the level is somewhere around 0.5 or 0.6, it shows that it is a stretch goal balancing difficulty and ease.

     

    Examples of key results:

     

    1. 40 percent of users will successfully navigate through the question matching system
    2. The new software system evaluations will see a 30 percent increase of “very satisfactory” ratings

  • Step 4

    Scoring Objectives
    Each objective should be scored based on the confidence of meeting it at the end of the designated month or quarterly deadline. This can depend on the overall rating system of 0 to 1 or 0 to 10. It is also not a bad idea to establish a mid-point scoring benchmark. This will help keep individuals and teams on track to see if they are on their way to meeting the ultimate goal. If someone is incredibly far away from their mid-point OKR, then they can better plan for the rest of the month or quarter.

  • Step 5

    Post-OKR Meeting
    Regardless of whether benchmarks were met, it is essential for employees to sit down with managers for individual OKRs or teams to meet to discuss departmental metrics.
    Depending on the outcome, those involved can consider the methods used to reach the OKR and why they were or were not met.

     

    It will provide an insightful perspective on strategies that can better help groups meet these OKRs in the future.

Part 7OKR Examples: Objectives and Key Results in Practice

Theory becomes useful the moment you see it applied. Here are OKR examples across several business functions to illustrate how objectives and key results work in practice. Notice that each objective is qualitative and inspiring, while each key result is quantitative and specific.

Sales Team OKR

  • Objective: Build a repeatable sales engine that accelerates revenue growth.
  • Key Result 1: Increase quarterly new-business revenue from $1.2M to $1.8M.
  • Key Result 2: Shorten average sales cycle from 45 days to 32 days.
  • Key Result 3: Grow qualified pipeline coverage from 2.5x to 3.5x.

Product Team OKR

  • Objective: Deliver a mobile experience that customers genuinely love.
  • Key Result 1: Achieve mobile app store rating of 4.6 or higher (currently 4.1).
  • Key Result 2: Increase monthly active mobile users from 18,000 to 30,000.
  • Key Result 3: Reduce average load time from 3.2 seconds to under 1.5 seconds.

People Operations Team OKR

  • Objective: Create an onboarding experience that sets new hires up for early success.
  • Key Result 1: Achieve a 90-day new-hire satisfaction score of 85% or above.
  • Key Result 2: Reduce time-to-productivity for new hires from 60 days to 40 days.
  • Key Result 3: Ensure 100% of new hires complete onboarding milestones within their first 30 days.

Company-Level OKR

  • Objective: Establish the company as the trusted leader in our market category.
  • Key Result 1: Grow unaided brand awareness from 12% to 25% in our target segment.
  • Key Result 2: Increase customer retention rate from 82% to 91%.
  • Key Result 3: Secure 3 earned media features in top-tier industry publications.

A few patterns to notice across these examples. Each objective uses clear, motivating language. Each key result starts with a verb (increase, reduce, achieve, grow) and includes a baseline number alongside a target. And each set limits key results to three or four, which keeps the team focused on what matters most.

Part 8Common OKR Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Even well-intentioned teams stumble when adopting OKRs for the first time. Recognizing the most frequent mistakes can save you months of frustration and help your organization see results sooner.

Writing key results that are actually tasks. This is the single most common error. A key result should describe an outcome, not an activity. “Launch the new landing page” is a task. “Increase landing page conversion rate from 2.1% to 3.5%” is a key result. If your key result has no number attached to it, it likely belongs on a project plan, not in your OKR.

Setting too many OKRs. When a team has seven objectives with four key results each, nothing gets prioritized. Most experienced OKR practitioners recommend two to four objectives per team per quarter, each with two to four key results. Fewer OKRs force harder choices, and those choices are the whole point of the exercise.

Treating OKRs as a top-down mandate. If leadership dictates every OKR without input from the teams responsible for executing them, engagement drops quickly. People commit to goals they helped shape. A healthy OKR process includes both top-down direction and bottom-up input.

Forgetting to check in during the quarter. OKRs that are set in January and reviewed in March with no touchpoints in between lose their ability to guide daily decisions. Weekly or biweekly progress updates keep OKRs relevant.

Using OKRs as a performance evaluation tool. When OKR scores directly determine bonuses or promotions, people set conservative targets they know they can hit. That behavior erodes the stretch-goal mindset that makes OKRs valuable. If you want to reference OKRs during performance conversations, focus on what the person learned and how they contributed, not on the numerical score itself.

Copying another company’s OKRs. Google’s OKRs became famous, and many organizations try to replicate them word for word. Every company has a different strategy, culture, and stage of growth. Use published examples as inspiration, then write OKRs that reflect your unique context.

Neglecting to score and reflect. Skipping the end-of-quarter review undermines the entire learning loop. Even a brief 30-minute retrospective for each team can surface insights that make the next quarter dramatically more productive.

Part 9OKRs vs KPIs: How These Goal-Setting Tools Differ

One of the most frequent sources of confusion when organizations adopt the OKR framework is how it relates to KPIs (Key Performance Indicators). The two are complementary tools, but they serve different purposes.

KPIs measure ongoing health. They track the steady-state performance of a business or function. Revenue growth rate, customer churn, employee turnover, and average response time are all classic KPIs. They tell you whether the engine is running well.

OKRs drive change. They define the specific improvements or new outcomes you want to achieve within a set timeframe. While a KPI might track your current churn rate of 8%, an OKR would set an objective to “dramatically improve customer retention” with a key result of “reduce monthly churn from 8% to 5% by end of Q2.”

In practice, KPIs often inform OKRs. When a KPI falls below an acceptable threshold, that signal can trigger a new OKR focused on fixing the problem. Once the OKR is achieved and the KPI stabilizes at a healthy level, the OKR may retire while the KPI continues to be monitored.

Here is a simple way to think about it:

  • KPIs answer the question: “How are we performing right now?”
  • OKRs answer the question: “What do we need to change, and by how much?”

Some organizations try to replace their KPI dashboards with OKRs, or vice versa. This rarely works well. The strongest approach is to maintain a KPI dashboard for business-as-usual visibility and layer OKRs on top for strategic focus areas where you need to move the needle.

Part 10How Companies Use OKRs Across Industries and Sectors

The OKR framework was born in the technology industry, but its application has spread far beyond Silicon Valley. Today, organizations of every size and sector use OKRs to focus effort, build alignment, and accelerate outcomes.

Technology and startups. Tech companies were early adopters, and OKRs remain deeply embedded in the culture of companies like Google, LinkedIn, and Spotify. For startups especially, OKRs provide a lightweight structure that grows with the organization. A five-person team can use OKRs to focus its limited resources, and the same framework scales as the company grows to 500 people.

Enterprise and manufacturing. Large enterprises use OKRs to break down silos between divisions. When a company with 10,000 employees publishes its OKRs internally, cross-functional visibility increases and redundant work decreases. Manufacturing companies have adopted OKRs to drive continuous improvement goals alongside their existing lean or Six Sigma practices.

Healthcare and education. Hospitals and school systems have used OKRs to align clinical or academic priorities across distributed teams. In these settings, the quarterly cadence helps leaders respond to evolving conditions while keeping the broader mission in view.

Government and nonprofit organizations. Several government agencies and nonprofits have embraced the OKR approach to increase accountability and focus on outcomes. In the public sector, where budgets are fixed and stakeholder expectations are high, OKRs help leaders articulate measurable progress toward policy goals. Nonprofits find value in OKRs because the framework shifts conversations from activities (“we hosted 12 events”) to impact (“we served 3,000 families and increased access to resources by 40%”).

Regardless of the industry, the core principles remain the same: define what matters most, measure the outcomes that prove progress, and review results with honesty. The language and cadence may adapt, but the OKR methodology translates across contexts with remarkable consistency.

Part 11Best Practices for the OKR Process

A good OKR system can take a company or department from average to excellent. These best practices could enhance that process and help guide OKRs to another level.

  1. Carefully communicate Stretch Goals

    If executives or leaders are developing stretch goals for the company, then they should be careful about how they relate these goals to employees. Meeting these challenging goals can initially create stress and frustration for those tasked with them, so it is important that leaders are clear about how many of them they are expected to meet. This should be a reasonable number that employees feel driven to achieve. Meeting stretch goals should be marketed as helpful for fulfilling the company mission and vision.

  2. OKRs Should Show Their Value

    Employees and teams should see the value in established OKRs. It should be something that directly benefits them and their performance and meets overall company goals. If these goals are met, they will make processes more manageable and will bring value to the work a department or individual employee does.

  3. Make OKRs a Routine Part of the Work Week

    The worst thing leaders can do is create objectives and key results and fail to discuss their progress regularly. By consistently mentioning these goals and aligning them with overall strategies then employees will make these a priority and continuously recognize their importance. It is a great idea to incorporate OKRs into weekly meetings and make time to discuss the likelihood of meeting specific benchmarks.

There is a reason why companies are adopting this method of goal setting: OKRs allow all hierarchies of a company to align their goals and set priorities for meeting them. However, for OKRs to indeed be useful, businesses have to employ processes for consistent communication so everyone can stay updated on OKR progress.

Part 12How to Use OKRs Effectively as a Goal-Setting Strategy

Understanding the OKR framework is one thing. Using it effectively is another. The gap between theory and results comes down to a few practical habits that distinguish organizations where OKRs thrive from those where they quietly fade after two quarters.

Start with strategy, then write OKRs. OKRs are a tool for executing strategy, not for defining it. Before your quarterly planning session, the leadership team should be able to articulate, in plain language, the company’s top two or three strategic priorities. OKRs then become the mechanism for translating those priorities into measurable progress.

Write objectives that energize people. A great objective feels like a rallying cry. It should be concise, memorable, and meaningful. Compare these two:

  • Weak: “Improve Q3 financial performance.”
  • Strong: “Build the financial foundation for our next stage of growth.”

Both point in the same direction, but the second one gives the team a story to attach to their work.

Limit key results to what you can actually influence. If your team does not control the inputs that drive a key result, the metric will feel arbitrary and demoralizing. Choose measures where your team’s effort directly impacts the outcome.

Make OKRs visible. Post them in shared documents, reference them in team meetings, and bring them up during one-on-ones. Visibility builds accountability and helps people connect their daily tasks to larger goals.

Iterate and improve. Your first quarter of OKRs will likely feel imperfect. That is expected. Treat the process as something you refine over time. After each cycle, ask: “Were our objectives the right ones? Were our key results truly measurable? Did we check in often enough?” Each honest answer makes the next quarter stronger.

The organizations that sustain OKRs over multiple years share one trait: they view the framework as a discipline, similar to budgeting or strategic planning, that gets better with repetition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does OKR stand for and what does it mean?

OKR stands for Objectives and Key Results. It is a goal-setting framework in which an objective describes a qualitative goal you want to achieve, and key results are the specific, measurable outcomes that indicate whether you have reached that objective. The format is simple: “I will [objective] as measured by [key results].”

How do OKRs work in practice?

OKRs work on a recurring cycle, typically quarterly. Teams set two to four objectives with two to four measurable key results each. Throughout the quarter, progress is tracked in weekly or biweekly check-ins. At the end of the cycle, each key result is scored on a 0.0 to 1.0 scale, and the team reflects on what worked and what to improve before starting the next cycle.

What is the difference between OKRs and KPIs?

KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) measure the ongoing health of a business function, such as monthly revenue or customer churn rate. OKRs define specific improvements you want to achieve within a set timeframe. KPIs tell you how you are performing today; OKRs focus on what needs to change and by how much. The two tools work well together.

How many OKRs should a team set per quarter?

Most OKR practitioners recommend two to four objectives per team per quarter, with each objective supported by two to four key results. Setting more than that dilutes focus and makes it difficult for the team to prioritize. If everything is a priority, nothing is.

How do you measure and score OKRs?

Each key result is typically scored on a 0.0 to 1.0 scale at the end of the quarter. A score of 0.7 to 1.0 means the key result was largely or fully achieved, 0.4 to 0.6 indicates meaningful progress, and 0.0 to 0.3 signals little movement. The objective’s overall score is usually the average of its key results. Scores are used for learning, not for directly evaluating performance.

What is the purpose of OKRs in a company?

The purpose of OKRs is to align an entire organization around its most important priorities, create transparency about what each team is working toward, and provide a measurable way to track progress. OKRs help companies move from vague strategic plans to concrete, time-bound goals that everyone can understand and contribute to.

Can OKRs be used in government and nonprofit organizations?

Yes. Government agencies and nonprofits increasingly use OKRs to focus on outcomes and improve accountability. In these settings, OKRs help shift conversations from activities completed (such as events hosted) to measurable impact (such as families served or access improved). The framework adapts well to mission-driven organizations.

What makes a key result effective versus a simple task?

An effective key result describes a measurable outcome, while a task describes an activity. “Launch a new onboarding email sequence” is a task. “Increase new-user activation rate from 35% to 50%” is a key result. The distinction matters because completing a task does not guarantee you achieved the outcome you cared about. Key results keep your focus on impact.

Should OKRs be made public within a company?

In most cases, yes. Making OKRs visible across the organization increases alignment, helps teams identify dependencies, and builds accountability. When people can see what other teams are focused on, collaboration improves and redundant work decreases. Transparency is one of the core principles that makes the OKR system effective.

How are OKRs different from traditional goal setting?

Traditional goal setting often produces a list of targets that are reviewed once a year. OKRs introduce a shorter cycle (usually quarterly), a clear separation between qualitative objectives and quantitative key results, regular check-ins throughout the period, and a scoring system that emphasizes learning over judgment. These structural differences make OKRs more responsive and actionable.

Posted in: Leadership